----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Glen Jarvis <glen@glenjarvis.com>
To: Sai <sai@saizai.com>
Cc: NoiseBridge Discuss <noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2011 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] bettermeans.com for governance

I personally LOVE the video on the front page and am incredibly impressed. I'll probably be an avid user of the product and advocate (let's see how it works for me in a few projects first, but it's very promising).

With that said, It's democracy based instead of anarchist based. So, its more about voting and community than about consensus and community. I don't suspect, therefore, it will please all of noisebridge. It may be great for a tool for some of the projects that are worked on at noisebridge.

Glen

On Sep 6, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Sai <sai@saizai.com> wrote:

> Y'all may be interested in bettermeans.com. Intro @
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAlnMWlvw9g, org details @
> http://bettermeans.com/front/open_enterprise_governance_model.html
>
> I have no comment on the quality of the service or sanity of the
> model, as I've not used either, but it seems to fit relatively closely
> with the nominal governance methods of NB, such that it may be
> desirable to use for non-IRL-only decisionmaking.
>
> Enjoy,
> - Sai
>
> P.S. [drama], just 'cause damn near anything about NB decisionmaking
> gets tagged with that sooner or later. :-P
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
_______________________________________________
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net
https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss