Lol, hopefully not the train.
Sure, I can join the move of the grant committee then.
Hi,
OK, I finally read https://brmlab.cz/members/vnitrni-predpisy/granty
and TMA is right.
=> we need 3 people from rada (council) to become members of grant committee
(tusk? dzoe? sumie? phyrexian? hexo?)
When we have 3 volunteers, rada needs to formally approve that:)
=> Then I will call for GK meeting.
But don't let your faith get weak, I see a light at the end of the tunnel,
and maybe it's not a train:)
n.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:16:08AM +0100, TMA via Rada wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:28:12PM +0100, A. via Rada wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > not sure if this is the correct channel for making official grant
> > committee decisions (maybe TMA can clarify? :)), but I vote in favor.
> >
> > No idea on the specific brand tho, I have DeWalt and am happy with it,
> > but that's just my useless subjective opinion.
>
> Well, there are some process issues that need to be resolved before
> moving forward. (I am writing from memory, the GK statute needs to be
> consulted.)
>
> (G1) The council needs to delegate three of its members to serve on the
> Grant commitee.
>
> (G2) Thereafter the Chairman needs to call for a GK meeting.
>
> (G3) On the meeting the matter can be discussed.
>
> There are additional issues on part of the proposal. I have not yet seen the
> formal requirements for a valid proposal submission met.
>
> As the proposal stands now, there is in fact nothing for the GK to
> consider. We are just discussing that it would be nice if some such
> proposal existed. :)
>
> The _contents_ as written in the first mail is really nice (except for
> the parts of Mars colonization sample grant proposal that should have
> been deleted.)
>
> (P1) But there is a wiki page for the proposal missing. (maybe, I have
> not checked recently)
>
> (P2) The link to such page was not sent to granty@ in the specific
> prescribed format.
>
> In order to proceed (G1) needs to be done. Before that the GK is
> incomplete and cannot function at all.
>
> After (G1) we can help finalize the proposal to be well documented in
> the prescribed manner (it is mostly done, but not wholly done).
>
> Thererafter (P1) and (P2) can be resolved.
>
> Afterwards (G2) and (G3) could proceed.
>
> --TMA
>
> P.S. It is mostly documenting the proces for accountability after
> several years when everybody has already forgotten the details
> remembering just "we were buing some wi-fi chainsaw back in the 19th
> century, it was when Timothy Calvin was the chairman"... :)
>
> P.P.S. If I have missed something, just point it out. I am (sadly) not
> (yet) infallible.
> _______________________________________________
> Rada mailing list
> Rada@brmlab.cz
> https://brmlab.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rada
_______________________________________________
Rada mailing list
Rada@brmlab.cz
https://brmlab.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rada